Overview of the Conservation of Australian Marine Invertebrates

Contents
 
Executive Summary
 
Introduction
 
Fauna & Places
  
Conservation General
 
Taxon Approach
 
Systems Approach
 
Threatening Process
 
Information Base
 
Administration
 
Education
 
References
 
Acknowledgements
 
Appendices
 
 
 

CHAPTER 8 – LEGISLATION, POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION

Different jurisdictions, in various countries and at all scales from locally to internationally, have taken a variety of different approaches to the conservation of natural resources and the protection of threatened fauna and flora. However, one of the most common approaches has involved the listing of threatened species (see Chapter 4). Depending on the definition used for “animals” and “wildlife” under these instruments, there may or may not be the possibility of listing marine invertebrates as “threatened species” or “protected wildlife”.

The role of species protection legislation, as it relates to invertebrates, was discussed by Yen and Butcher (1997) and Hutchings and Ponder (1999). Yen and Butcher outlined various arguments for and against protective legislation.

Shortcomings of legislation

8.1       International agreements – Conventions, Treaties and Protocols

Australia is a party to a wide variety of international agreements[177], some of which (such as CITES and the World Heritage Convention) have direct relevance for the conservation of marine invertebrates and their habitats. Others, while not directly relevant, nevertheless have some bearing, for instance through habitat protection or the control of threatening processes. Examples of the latter include:

  • The Climate Change Convention 1992,

  • The Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat (the RAMSAR Convention) 1971,

  • The International Convention on Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter (the London Dumping Convention) 1972,

  • The International Convention for Prevention of Marine Pollution from Ships (MARPOL) 1973, and

  • The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 (although Article 61 is of direct relevance).

The relevance of a range of international agreements to Australia’s management of the marine environment was reviewed in a Background Paper to the Oceans Policy (Herriman et al. 1997), and (in more abbreviated form) in Parker (1995).

A summary of those International Agreements relevant to marine invertebrate conservation is provided in Table 8.1. Several of the more important international instruments, from the point of view of marine invertebrate conservation, are listed and discussed in more detail below.

Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora 1973 (CITES)

Invertebrates listed under CITES

World Heritage

Biological diversity

RAMSAR Convention

Other agreements (relating to habitat protection)

8.2            Australian legislation and its administration

Under the Australian Constitution, environmental matters – which include biodiversity conservation and natural resource management – have been interpreted as being primarily a State and Territory issue, Federal jurisdiction being limited to areas such as trade, Commonwealth waters, and international treaties (although Commonwealth governments have nevertheless enacted their own environmental legislation). Local government areas of environmental responsibility include catchment issues, development approvals and planning. 

Australian legislation and how it relates to invertebrate conservation in Australia has been reviewed by Yen and Butcher (1997) and Hutchings and Ponder (1999). The following discussion is primarily concerned with those pieces of legislation directly relevant to marine invertebrate conservation (summarised in Table 8.2). This review is based upon, but expanded and updated from Appendix 1 of Hutchings and Ponder (1999). It is clear that there is:

In addition, with the separation of agencies or legislation based on habitat (aquatic vs terrestrial, marine vs non-marine), the management of transitional habitats can be problematic - in particular estuarine or supralittoral habitats.

Overall, there is a need to develop greater integration and more consistent standards Australia-wide, particularly in relation to those taxa, including marine invertebrates, that at present receive inadequate legislative protection.

Most of the other environmental legislation, which can comprise a vast array of Acts and Regulations[185] dealing with environmental planning and assessment, environmental protection and pollution control, resource allocation and special development approvals, are mostly not of direct relevance to invertebrates. However, some have the potential to be very important, particularly in relation to mitigation of threatening processes and instigation of planning controls. Even legislation that deals, primarily or wholly, with activities on land can affect organisms in the marine environment, for instance through its influence on land use, land clearing, run-off, pollution etc. (see Chapter 6). Yet, there is little integration or cooperation among the various agencies with responsibility for administration of the various Acts[186].

8.2.1      National coordination

Yen and Butcher (1997) suggested that the problem of species being listed as protected in one jurisdiction but not in another could be partially addressed if the Australian and New Zealand Environment Council (ANZECC[187]) provided a framework for invertebrates as they had with vertebrates because ANZECC maintained national lists of threatened Australian fauna, flora and ecological communities. However, the Commonwealth Govt. is currently creating a new council, the Environment Protection and Heritage Council, that will be an amalgamation of the National Environment Protection Council (NEPC), the non-Natural Resources Management (NRM) component of ANZECC and Heritage Ministers' Meeting. A second council, the Natural Resource Management Council will combine the NRM issues from the Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand (ARMCANZ), the Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (ANZECC) and the Ministerial Council on Forestry, Fisheries and Aquaculture (MCFFA).

8.2.2      Commonwealth

The Commonwealth holds a range of powers, including the implementation of international treaties, which could theoretically be used to achieve considerable control over environmental matters (Dixon 1994). During the 1970s and 1980s, these were used to override State decisions on issues such as the damming of the Franklin River in Tasmania, mining of limestone in Moreton Bay and sand mining on Fraser Island. However, successive Commonwealth governments have been reluctant to use these powers, focusing instead on the prime responsibility of the States for environmental protection and the need for a cooperative approach among all jurisdictions (Woinarski and Fisher 1999). This position was formalised in the Intergovernmental Agreement on the Environment (1992), which recognised that the Commonwealth’s role was largely one of coordination.

The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act)[189] gives the Commonwealth primary responsibility on matters of national environmental significance and is now the key piece of Commonwealth legislation with relevance for the conservation of mar ine invertebrates.

Listing of threatened taxa and communities

The ability to list threatened ecological communities and threatening processes are potentially one of great value for the conservation of marine invertebrates and other taxa not well covered by the threatened species approach. However, these provisions have yet to live up to their promise. To date 27 ecological communities have been listed, none of which is marine. There are currently 11 listed Key Threatening Processes (Schedule 3), but again, none is of relevance to marine invertebrates. All but three (incidental catch of seabirds and turtles and land clearing) concern terrestrial feral pests and pathogens. However, land clearing has significant indirect impacts on coastal ecosystems.  The EPBC Act differs from the ESP Act in enabling the listing of Threatening Processes even when preparation of a Threat Abatement Plan is not feasible – it is a separate decision whether a Plan should be prepared.

Aside from the threatened species provisions discussed above, the EPBC Act has a number of other features of relevance to marine invertebrate conservation. These include the ability to declare marine protected areas in Commonwealth areas, the provisions relating to protection and management of World Heritage areas and RAMSAR wetlands of international significance, and the requirement to prepare impact assessments for Commonwealth-managed fisheries. There are also new, specialised criteria to “assess the conservation status of marine biota” (Hill 1998), and special provisions (Part 13 Division 4) which make it an offence to take, kill or injure any “listed marine species” in a Commonwealth area except under limited conditions[193]. As currently constituted this list does not include any marine invertebrates, but it is clearly a potential vehicle that could be used to benefit marine invertebrate conservation.

Commonwealth Acts, which give effect to Australia's obligations under relevant international treaties, are listed in Table 8.1 (a table of relevant international treaties and their implementation in Australia). Additional Acts with some relevance to marine invertebrate conservation are listed in below.

Other Commonwealth Acts with some relevance for marine invertebrate conservation

8.2.3            New South Wales

In NSW, marine invertebrates are classed as ‘fish’ under the Fisheries Management Act 1994, Marine Parks Act 1997 and Fisheries Management Amendment Act 1997, which define ‘fish’ as:

“marine, estuarine or freshwater fish or other aquatic animal life at any stage of their life history (whether alive or dead) ... (including) oysters and other aquatic molluscs; and crustaceans; and echinoderms; and beachworms and other aquatic polychaetes, ...(but not) any species of whales, marine mammals, reptiles, birds, (or) amphibians”.

Thus all marine (and other aquatic) invertebrates come under the fisheries legislation and their conservation is the responsibility of NSW Fisheries. Part of the purpose of the Fisheries Management Amendment Act 1997 was to extend legislative protection (given to terrestrial animals and plants under the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995) to threatened aquatic animals and vegetation.

Other relevant Acts in NSW

Bans on commercial fishing in estuarine waters in NSW

8.2.4            Victoria

In Victoria, the key piece of legislation for the listing of threatened species is the Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988[196].

Threatened taxa and communities of flora and fauna are listed in Schedule 2.

In addition to the Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act, the Department of Natural Resources and Environment (NRE) maintains lists of threatened fauna and flora, including threatened invertebrate fauna, whether terrestrial, freshwater or marine (Doeg 1999).

Another avenue for marine invertebrate conservation is under the Fisheries Act 1995, which allows the declaration of any aquatic taxon or community of flora or fauna (not only rare or endangered species) as ‘protected aquatic biota’. Consequently permits are required to take, destroy or disturb that species or community. So far, no taxa have been declared (apart from those aquatic taxa automatically listed under the Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988) (Doeg 1999).

Other relevant Acts in Victoria

8.2.5            Tasmania

Until 1995, the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1970 provided for the establishment and maintenance of National Parks and reserves, and the listing of endangered wildlife. Under the Wildlife Regulations of this Act, the only invertebrates that were declared as wholly protected wildlife were cave invertebrates. Since the proclamation in November 1995 of the Threatened Species Protection Act 1995, invertebrates can be listed in the Schedules of this Act as Endangered, Vulnerable or Rare (Taylor and Bryant 1997).

The application of Tasmanian legislation to the coastal marine environment is determined by the Tasmanian State Coastal Policy 1996. This Policy applies to the Crown in all its capacities, in particular through the State Policies and Projects Act 1993 and the Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993. Subject to contrary statutory provision, it also applies to statutory authorities.

Other relevant Acts

Macquarie Island

8.2.6            South Australia

There is no specific threatened species legislation in South Australia, although it was recommended in a draft Endangered Species strategy released under a previous government (Greenslade 1999). Although South Australia does not have specific threatened species legislation, provisions for listing threatened species can be found in the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972, with endangered, vulnerable and rare species being listed in Schedules 7, 8 and 9 respectively. Invertebrates cannot be listed as “protected animals” under this Act, as "animals" are defined as comprising only mammals, birds and reptiles. Under the Act, invertebrates and their habitats are legally protected in all reserves, including marine invertebrates in the several marine reserves along the coastline.

As in other States, the fisheries legislation (section 42 of the Fisheries Act 1982[25]) enables various categories of “fish” (including invertebrates) to be declared as “protected”, with their collection prohibited; other commercially important species are subject to special management arrangements. Examples of the latter include abalones (Haliotis spp.), the Blue Swimmer Crab (Portunus pelagicus), the Southern Rock Lobster (Jasus edwardsii) and Southern Calamari (Sepioteuthis australis). The Fisheries Act 1982 also has provisions for the declaration of aquatic reserves and marine parks.

The Environment Protection (Marine) Policy was introduced in 1994, in recognition of the need to control marine pollution originating from land based activities, to ensure environmental monitoring and improvement programs were included as a condition of all discharge licenses. This Policy requires dischargers to demonstrate by March 2001 that they are complying with minimum standards. Our Seas and Coasts - a marine and estuarine strategy for South Australia was released in August 1998.

Other relevant Acts

Marine Protected Areas

8.2.7            Western Australia

In Western Australia the legislation most relevant to threatened invertebrates is the Wildlife Conservation Act 1950, which is currently administered by the Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM).

A Wetlands Conservation Policy for Western Australia was launched in August 1997.

Other relevant Acts

8.2.8            Northern Territory

The Territory Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act 2000 is administered by the Parks and Wildlife Commission of the Northern Territory. It provides for the conservation and management of wildlife, establishment of reserves, and the listing of protected and specially protected animals and plants (Schedule 7 of the Territory Wildlife Regulations lists specially protected animals. The definition of "wildlife" in the Act has been amended in the latest revision so that it can now include all animals, including invertebrates. Invertebrates are thus not specifically excluded from protection under this Act as they were previously (Yen and Butcher 1997; Hutchings and Ponder 1999). To date, no marine invertebrates are listed under this modif ied legislation but six terrestrial arthropods are.

Other relevant Acts

8.2.9            Queensland

The Nature Conservation Act 1992 enables any (including marine) native organisms to be listed and protected under the first five Schedules of this Act (presumed extinct, endangered, vulnerable, rare, common). These are listed in the Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 1994[208], and a summary is available on the Environmental Protection Agency’s website. Several invertebrates are listed, all butterflies. There are no provisions to list communities or threatening processes. There are currently no protocols for accepting public nominations; relevant experts review internal nominations assessed using IUCN criteria. After review, nominations are considered by the Scientific Advisory Committee that makes recommendations to the Minister (Driscoll 1999).

Other relevant Acts

The Great Barrier Reef

8.2.10      Territories

Norfolk Island

Christmas Island

Australian Antarctic Territory and Heard and McDonald Islands

8.2.11            Legislation at the local level

Australia has a great diversity of local council regulations but local council by-laws and conservation regulations can play an important role in the conservation of invertebrates by maintaining and protecting habitat (Yen and Butcher 1997). 

8.3      National policies and strategies

8.3.1     Ecologically Sustainable Development

The origins of the concept of sustainable development stem back to the release of the World Conservation Strategy in 1980, and perhaps more importantly, the 1987 report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future (the Brundtland Report). The Brundtland Report recognised that sustainable development means adopting lifestyles within the planet’s ecological means, made it clear that the world’s current pattern of economic growth is not sustainable, and argued that a new type of development is required to meet foreseeable human needs (Commonwealth of Australia 1992).

8.3.2      Biological diversity

The internationally accepted importance of conserving biodiversity was recognised by the Convention on Biological Diversity (Section 8.1.3), and this is reflected in the National Strategy for the Conservation of Australia's Biological Diversity (Commonwealth of Australia 1996). This Strategy, which has been endorsed by all State, Territory and Commonwealth governments, has as its goal the protection of biological diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and systems. It recognises that biodiversity conservation results in many benefits, that there is a need for more knowledge and better conservation practices, and that we share the earth with many other life forms that have intrinsic values.

8.3.3      Threatened species

Under the 1992 Intergovernmental Agreement on the Environment, the Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (ANZECC) was charged with developing and reporting on a strategy for a national approach to the protection of rare, vulnerable and endangered species, taking into account the Australian National Strategy for the Conservation of Species and Communities Threatened with Extinction prepared by the Endangered Species Advisory Committee (ESAC). This strategy was to be implemented during the next 10 years.

8.3.4            Oceans policy

Australia’s Oceans Policy was launched on 23 December 1998, after a period of consultation following the release of Australia's Oceans Policy - An Issues Paper, for public comment in May 1998.

8.3.5      Marine Science and Technology Plan

Released in June 1999 as a companion document to the Oceans Policy, the Marine Science and Technology Plan provides a scientific underpinning for the implementation of the goals and initiatives of the Oceans Policy. It deals with issues such as marine industries, mineral exploration, defence and surveillance etc. as well as marine science, biodiversity and conservation.

Objectives relevant to marine invertebrate conservation.

Program 1:  Understanding the marine environment

Program 2:  Using and Caring for the Marine Environment

Program 3:  Infrastructure for Understanding and Utilising the Marine Environment

8.3.6      Ocean Rescue 2000

The Ocean Rescue 2000 Program was announced in 1991 as a 10-year program to achieve conservation of Australia’s marine environments. However, this program has been superseded by the Coasts and Clean Seas Program under the National Heritage Trust (NHT), which has provided funding for similar and other marine conservation projects.

Marine and Coastal Community Network

State of the Marine Environment Reporting

National Marine Education Program

The National Marine Education Program was coordinated by GBRMPA, with input from EA. The series of three TV community service announcements (“Our Oceans - Our Heritage”), produced by ANCA in collaboration with GBRMPA, were screened nationally during 1993 (Fien et al. 1999).

National Marine Information System

8.3.7      Water Quality

National Principles for the Provision of Water for Ecosystems 1996 and National Water Quality Management Strategy 1992.

Background.

8.4       Main issues and recommended actions

Issues

Despite the existence of international programs and several substantial national policies concerned with marine conservation, there is a considerable disparity in the approaches to marine conservation, and the recognition of invertebrates, in different Australian jurisdictions. This applies to:

  • The legislative recognition of marine invertebrates;

  • The legislative framework in which conservation measures applicable to marine invertebrates can be implemented.

  • The agencies responsible for the conservation of marine environments and the organisms that live in them.

The existence of multiple agencies responsible for the administration of various aspects of the marine environment results in complexity, inefficiency and lack of coordination and some rationalisation would be desirable in most jurisdictions.

  • There is no separation of the agencies responsible for conservation and exploitation in the marine environment in some jurisdictions, with the likelihood of conflicts of interest arising.

  • The separation of responsibilities into marine and non-marine, or aquatic and terrestrial, habitats by way of legislation and/or agencies, can result in the vulnerable transitional habitats (that contain unique biota) being ignored.

There is often an inconsistent approach to marine conservation. For example fishing is often allowed in marine reserves but there are blanket bans on harvesting or collecting even superabundant, or the dead remains of, marine invertebrates.

Collecting (of shells etc.) by responsible collectors, interested children etc. should not be generally discouraged (demonstrated local or specific threats to the habitat or fauna should be managed individually) as such activities are a means of gaining interest in invertebrates and a potential source of valuable information.

  • For example, dead (empty) strandline shells/tests etc., should not be treated identically to living specimens (as they are in some jurisdictions) - this resulting in a potential loss of information and an educational tool.

Recommended actions

We recommend the adoption of a uniform national approach that will result in: A consistent or coordinated approach to marine biodiversity conservation and relevant legislation in Australia.

The recognition of marine invertebrate taxa as fauna of equal status to marine vertebrates.

The emphasis in legislation should be on habitat conservation and reduction in threatening processes, with the focus on individual taxa, while being important in some circumstances, not the main thrust for marine invertebrate conservation.

The definitions employed in legislation need to be carefully framed to best achieve the desired conservation.

  • More flexible approaches to collecting and harvesting are required; such as

  • Imposing bag limits for specific taxa as an alternative strategy to blanket bans.

  • and some rationalisation would be desirable in most jurisdictions.

  • There is no separation of the agencies responsible for conservation and exploitation in the marine environment in some jurisdictions, with the likelihood of conflicts of interest arising.

  • The separation of responsibilities into marine and non-marine, or aquatic and terrestrial, habitats by way of legislation and/or agencies, can result in the vulnerable transitional habitats (that contain unique biota) being ignored.

The emphasis in legislation should be on habitat conservation and reduction in threatening processes rather than a focus on individual taxa.

There is often an inconsistent approach to marine conservation. For example fishing is often allowed in marine reserves but there are blanket bans on harvesting or collecting even superabundant, or the dead remains of, marine invertebrates.

  • The definitions employed in legislation need to be carefully framed to best achieve the desired conservation outcome (for example, dead (empty) shells/tests should not be treated identically to living specimens as they are in some jurisdictions resulting in a potential loss of information and an educational tool).

  • More flexible approaches to collecting and harvesting are required:

 

back next

Australian Museum Environment Australia

Copyright © Environment Australia, 2002
Department of Environment and Heritage