|
The fact
that States and Territories are responsible for the management of
conservation and related issues within their own borders has led to the
development of a diverse body of legislation, with considerable disparity
in the approaches taken by different jurisdictions. This has led to
parochial anomalies in relation to threatened species, where (for
instance) a species can be protected as rare in one jurisdiction, even if
it is extremely abundant in another, or a genuinely threatened species can
be afforded legislative protection in one jurisdiction but not in another
where it occurs.
|
|
